Posts

Showing posts from July, 2013

E-books at the library: not only inconvenient, but un-scholarly

Image
I have been fed up for some time with the inconvenient features of e-books owned by my university library. Now they are turning out to be anti-scholarly. In this post I will just vent about this a bit; there are some suggestions to more systematic (and better-informed) online posts below. EMAIL #1, to my university library    ------------------------------------------------------------  This is my venting about some things that really bug me about digital books. First, I dislike digital books. For most books, I would MUCH rather have a physical book in my hands. I skim library books more than I read them completely, and skimming is much easier with a physical book than with a digital book. Perhaps if the software were better, this would be less of an irritation. Second, E-brary is one of the worst programs I know of. First, it doesn’t work with Firefox. Second, when I use it with IE, it either stops working in a benign way (giving cryptic error messages), or else it hang...

What if you bought an artifact in a shop, and then published it as a great discovery?

Image
The earliest bird? Or the latest looting scandal? Does that sound bizarre and unlikely? That is what paleontologists are doing increasingly, according to a news story in a recent issue of Science ( "Authenticity of China's Fabulous Fossils gets new Scrutiny," by Michael Balter, Science 340 (June 7, 2013), pp. 1153-54) . A recent paper in Nature announced the discovery of Aurornis, a new species that supposedly resolves many issues about the origins of birds from dinosaurs. *** Godefroit, Pascal, Andrea Cau, Hu Dong-Yu, Francois Escuillie, Wu Wenhao, and Gareth Dyke,  2013,  "A Jurassic avialan dinosaur from China resolves the early phylogenetic history of birds." Nature advance online publication . *** The article itself doesn't mention exactly where the fossil was found or how it was excavated. But in the Supplemental Materials the authors admit that it was purchased from a fossil dealer. Oh, and perhaps the proposed dating is off by 35 million years beca...